Whiki - User contributions [en]

Deleuze 1990

2010-05-30T20:07:00Z

98.122.182.39:

Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'' Trans. by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale. Ed. by Constantin V. Boundas. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1990.

== First Series of Paradoxes of Pure Becoming ==

== Second Series of Paradoxes of Surface Effects ==

== Third Series of the Proposition ==

== Fourth Series of Dualities ==

== Fifth Series of Sense ==

== Sixth Series on Serialization ==

== Seventh Series of Esoteric Words ==

== Eight Series of Structure ==

== Ninth Series of the Problematic ==

== Tenth Series of the Ideal Game ==

Deleuze 1990

2010-05-30T20:06:13Z

98.122.182.39:

Bowers 1949

2010-05-30T20:03:31Z

98.122.182.39: Created page with 'Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949. == Descriptive Bibliography == == Format and Collational Formul…'

Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.

== Descriptive Bibliography ==

== Format and Collational Formula ==

Deleuze 1990

2010-05-30T20:01:46Z

98.122.182.39: Created page with 'Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'' Trans. by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale. Ed. by Constantin V. Boundas. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1990.'

Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'' Trans. by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale. Ed. by Constantin V. Boundas. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1990.

Main Page

2010-05-30T20:01:21Z

98.122.182.39:

== Notes ==

=== Books ===

==== [[Bowers 1949|Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.]] ====

==== [[Deleuze 1990|Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'' New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1990.]] ====

==== [[Foucault 1970|Foucault, Michel. ''The Order of Things.'' New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.]] ====

==== [[Johns 1998|Johns, Adrian. ''The Nature of the Book.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.]] ====

==== [[Piper 2009|Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.]] ====

=== Classes ===

Main Page

2010-05-30T20:00:43Z

98.122.182.39:

== Notes ==

=== Books ===

==== [[Bowers 1949|Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.]] ====

==== [[Deleuze 1990|Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'']] ====

==== [[Foucault 1970|Foucault, Michel. ''The Order of Things.'' New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.]] ====

==== [[Johns 1998|Johns, Adrian. ''The Nature of the Book.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.]] ====

==== [[Piper 2009|Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.]] ====

=== Classes ===

Johns 1998

2010-05-30T20:00:27Z

98.122.182.39: Created page with 'Johns, Adrian. ''The Nature of the Book.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.'

Johns, Adrian. ''The Nature of the Book.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

Foucault 1970

2010-05-30T19:59:54Z

98.122.182.39: Created page with 'Foucault, Michel. ''The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.'' New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.'

Foucault, Michel. ''The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.'' New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.

Main Page

2010-05-30T19:59:42Z

98.122.182.39:

== Notes ==

=== Books ===

==== [[Bowers 1949|Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.]] ====

==== [[Deleuze 1990|Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'']] ====

==== [[Foucault 1970|Foucault, Michel. ''The Order of Things.'' New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.]] ====

==== [[Johns 1998|Johns, Adrian. ''The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.]] ====

==== [[Piper 2009|Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.]] ====

=== Classes ===

Main Page

2010-05-30T19:58:57Z

98.122.182.39:

== Notes ==

=== Books ===

==== [[Bowers 1949|Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.]] ====

==== [[Deleuze 1990|Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'']] ====

==== [[Foucault 1970|Foucault, Michel. ''The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.'' New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.]] ====

==== [[Johns 1998|Johns, Adrian. ''The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.]] ====

==== [[Piper 2009|Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.]] ====

=== Classes ===

Main Page

2010-05-30T19:57:25Z

98.122.182.39:

== Notes ==

=== Books ===

==== [[Bowers 1949|Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.]] ====

==== [[Deleuze 1990|Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'']] ====

==== [[Foucault 1970|Foucault, Michel. ''The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.'' New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.]] ====

==== [[Johns 1998|Johns, Adrian. ''The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.]] ====

==== [[Piper 2009|Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press,
2009.]] ====

=== Classes ===

Main Page

2010-05-30T19:52:52Z

98.122.182.39:

== Notes ==
=== Books ===
==== [[Bowers 1949|Bowers, Fredson. ''Principles of Bibliographical Description.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.]] ====
==== [[Deleuze 1990|Deleuze, Gilles. ''Logic of Sense.'']] ====
==== [[Piper 2009|Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.]] ====
=== Classes ===

Piper 2009

2010-05-30T19:51:35Z

98.122.182.39: /* Networking */

Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books: The Making of the Bibliographic Imagination in the Romantic Age.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

== Introduction: Bibliographic Subjects ==

''"Hypothesis: All is Leaf." -- J. W. Goethe''

books <--> literature

: "Learning how to read books and how to want books did not simply occur through the technological, commercial, or legal conditions that made the growing proliferation of books possible. The making of such bibliographic fantasies was also importantly a product of the very narratives and symbolic operations contained ''within'' books as well. It was through romantic literature where individuals came to understand themselves." (4)

"bibliographic surplus" at the turn of the 19th century (5)
* increasing '''diversity''' of books and bibliographic formats circulating
* increasing '''homogeneity''' of geography; books translated across multiple sites (6)

using bibliographic imagination of 19c to understand digital present (7)

:"A study of how nineteenth-century individuals became wedded to or possessed by their books can broaden our perspective of the nature of 'new media' cultures and historical experiences of 'media transition. It can offer parallels, but also differences, to our current process of adapting to communicative change." (7)

emphasizing '''continuities''' between bookish past and digital present; similarities:
* the notion of a network
* the status of the "copy"
* remediating culture data into new forms
* creativity as ''intermedial'' thinking/making (7-8)

these communicative practices "'''came into being'''" during the romantic age (8)

:"The digital provides us wit ha critical lens to see the bibliographic with fresh eyes. But my own work is driven by an alternative desire to show us how the history of books, and romantic books in particular, can help us contextualize our understanding of digital or new media today." (8)

book history helps us recover a sense of "social authorship" (9-10);
but literature can also tell us much about the history of the book (10)
:"Literature makes books as much as books make literature." (11)

:"I am interested in exploring how the symbolic movements ''in'' texts, whether of speech, things, or people, functioned as interpretations of the bibliographic environments through which such texts circulated. ... I want to ask how such circulatory energy was deployed to interrogate new conditions of communicating in books." (11)

in literary studies, romantic age gave us '''opposition between technics and aesthetics''', encouraging us to '''forget the materiality of the book''' -- in fact, focusing on book as object was seen as a mental disorder during the early 19c;
yet book history shows upsurge in production of books during this period (12)
* book was becoming "naturalized" during the 19c (13)
:"The work of romantic writers -- both their books and their fictions -- functioned as a key space where the changes to the material conditions of writing and communication that defined the nineteenth century could be rehearsed, interrogated, and ultimately normalized." (13)

romantic books were negotiating local/global, individual/collective;
work seen as individualistic, from a single genius author, yet book increasingly produced collectively (15)

'''intermediality''' is core to romantic book (16)

== Networking ==

the Weimar edition of Goethe's posthumous papers served as a textual monument mirroring the physical monument of the Goethe and Schille Archive, completed 1896 (19-20)

=== ''Wilhelm Meister's Travels'' ===

"landmark of the modern novel," precursor to Joyce's ''Ulysses'' (23)

"wild proliferation of genres" and discourses within the novel (23)

book <--> narrative <--> sections <--> objects

:"Where Novalis had written down in his notebooks that his task was 'to find a universe in a book,' Goethe's project by contrast relocated this universe across an entire spectrum of printed books and thus '''redefined the literary work as something material, processual, and spatially dispersed'''." (24-5)

affirms novelistic tradition and novel's cosmological claims, but adds "mediological dimension" (25);
conceives of the book not as a "spiritual fortress" (like the Weimar edition) nor "a totality existing for itself: (Schlegel), but "relational, transformable, and dynamic entities";
* book and novel were "'''refigured, in a word, as networks'''" (25)

:"For Goethe, the emerging concern of modern fiction was no longer simply what texts could mean, but how such mobile, evolving, collectively generated webs of writing were to be navigated." (25)

goes through history of publishing advertisements/papers/collections that would make up the ''Travels'';
important to see these works as unfolding over time -- we can't retroactively impose unity on the parts that were circulating (26-7)
* "such practices aimed to reorient the activity of reading itself as far more '''polyfocal'''" (27)

'''Where is the ''Travels'' located?''' (30)

advertisements and excerpts circulated not just as marketing devices, but as a "bibliographic scene against which the ''Travels'' would come to understand itself" (30-1)

== Copying ==
== Processing ==
== Sharing ==
== Overhearing ==

Piper 2009

2010-05-30T19:46:53Z

98.122.182.39: /* Networking */

Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books: The Making of the Bibliographic Imagination in the Romantic Age.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

== Introduction: Bibliographic Subjects ==

''"Hypothesis: All is Leaf." -- J. W. Goethe''

books <--> literature

: "Learning how to read books and how to want books did not simply occur through the technological, commercial, or legal conditions that made the growing proliferation of books possible. The making of such bibliographic fantasies was also importantly a product of the very narratives and symbolic operations contained ''within'' books as well. It was through romantic literature where individuals came to understand themselves." (4)

"bibliographic surplus" at the turn of the 19th century (5)
* increasing '''diversity''' of books and bibliographic formats circulating
* increasing '''homogeneity''' of geography; books translated across multiple sites (6)

using bibliographic imagination of 19c to understand digital present (7)

:"A study of how nineteenth-century individuals became wedded to or possessed by their books can broaden our perspective of the nature of 'new media' cultures and historical experiences of 'media transition. It can offer parallels, but also differences, to our current process of adapting to communicative change." (7)

emphasizing '''continuities''' between bookish past and digital present; similarities:
* the notion of a network
* the status of the "copy"
* remediating culture data into new forms
* creativity as ''intermedial'' thinking/making (7-8)

these communicative practices "'''came into being'''" during the romantic age (8)

:"The digital provides us wit ha critical lens to see the bibliographic with fresh eyes. But my own work is driven by an alternative desire to show us how the history of books, and romantic books in particular, can help us contextualize our understanding of digital or new media today." (8)

book history helps us recover a sense of "social authorship" (9-10);
but literature can also tell us much about the history of the book (10)
:"Literature makes books as much as books make literature." (11)

:"I am interested in exploring how the symbolic movements ''in'' texts, whether of speech, things, or people, functioned as interpretations of the bibliographic environments through which such texts circulated. ... I want to ask how such circulatory energy was deployed to interrogate new conditions of communicating in books." (11)

in literary studies, romantic age gave us '''opposition between technics and aesthetics''', encouraging us to '''forget the materiality of the book''' -- in fact, focusing on book as object was seen as a mental disorder during the early 19c;
yet book history shows upsurge in production of books during this period (12)
* book was becoming "naturalized" during the 19c (13)
:"The work of romantic writers -- both their books and their fictions -- functioned as a key space where the changes to the material conditions of writing and communication that defined the nineteenth century could be rehearsed, interrogated, and ultimately normalized." (13)

romantic books were negotiating local/global, individual/collective;
work seen as individualistic, from a single genius author, yet book increasingly produced collectively (15)

'''intermediality''' is core to romantic book (16)

== Networking ==

the Weimar edition of Goethe's posthumous papers served as a textual monument mirroring the physical monument of the Goethe and Schille Archive, completed 1896 (19-20)

=== ''Wilhelm Meister's Travels'' ===

"landmark of the modern novel," precursor to Joyce's ''Ulysses'' (23)

"wild proliferation of genres" and discourses within the novel (23)

book <--> narrative <--> sections <--> objects

:"Where Novalis had written down in his notebooks that his task was 'to find a universe in a book,' Goethe's project by contrast relocated this universe across an entire spectrum of printed books and thus '''redefined the literary work as something material, processual, and spatially dispersed'''." (24-5)

affirms novelistic tradition and novel's cosmological claims, but adds "mediological dimension" (25);
conceives of the book not as a "spiritual fortress" (like the Weimar edition) nor "a totality existing for itself: (Schlegel), but "relational, transformable, and dynamic entities";
* book and novel were "'''refigured, in a word, as networks'''" (25)
* "For Goethe, the emerging concern of modern fiction was no longer simply what texts could mean, but how such mobile, evolving, collectively generated webs of writing were to be navigated." (25)

== Copying ==
== Processing ==
== Sharing ==
== Overhearing ==

Piper 2009

2010-05-30T19:45:12Z

98.122.182.39: /* Networking */

Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books: The Making of the Bibliographic Imagination in the Romantic Age.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

== Introduction: Bibliographic Subjects ==

''"Hypothesis: All is Leaf." -- J. W. Goethe''

books <--> literature

: "Learning how to read books and how to want books did not simply occur through the technological, commercial, or legal conditions that made the growing proliferation of books possible. The making of such bibliographic fantasies was also importantly a product of the very narratives and symbolic operations contained ''within'' books as well. It was through romantic literature where individuals came to understand themselves." (4)

"bibliographic surplus" at the turn of the 19th century (5)
* increasing '''diversity''' of books and bibliographic formats circulating
* increasing '''homogeneity''' of geography; books translated across multiple sites (6)

using bibliographic imagination of 19c to understand digital present (7)

:"A study of how nineteenth-century individuals became wedded to or possessed by their books can broaden our perspective of the nature of 'new media' cultures and historical experiences of 'media transition. It can offer parallels, but also differences, to our current process of adapting to communicative change." (7)

emphasizing '''continuities''' between bookish past and digital present; similarities:
* the notion of a network
* the status of the "copy"
* remediating culture data into new forms
* creativity as ''intermedial'' thinking/making (7-8)

these communicative practices "'''came into being'''" during the romantic age (8)

:"The digital provides us wit ha critical lens to see the bibliographic with fresh eyes. But my own work is driven by an alternative desire to show us how the history of books, and romantic books in particular, can help us contextualize our understanding of digital or new media today." (8)

book history helps us recover a sense of "social authorship" (9-10);
but literature can also tell us much about the history of the book (10)
:"Literature makes books as much as books make literature." (11)

:"I am interested in exploring how the symbolic movements ''in'' texts, whether of speech, things, or people, functioned as interpretations of the bibliographic environments through which such texts circulated. ... I want to ask how such circulatory energy was deployed to interrogate new conditions of communicating in books." (11)

in literary studies, romantic age gave us '''opposition between technics and aesthetics''', encouraging us to '''forget the materiality of the book''' -- in fact, focusing on book as object was seen as a mental disorder during the early 19c;
yet book history shows upsurge in production of books during this period (12)
* book was becoming "naturalized" during the 19c (13)
:"The work of romantic writers -- both their books and their fictions -- functioned as a key space where the changes to the material conditions of writing and communication that defined the nineteenth century could be rehearsed, interrogated, and ultimately normalized." (13)

romantic books were negotiating local/global, individual/collective;
work seen as individualistic, from a single genius author, yet book increasingly produced collectively (15)

'''intermediality''' is core to romantic book (16)

== Networking ==

the Weimar edition of Goethe's posthumous papers served as a textual monument mirroring the physical monument of the Goethe and Schille Archive, completed 1896 (19-20)

=== ''Wilhelm Meister's Travels'' ===

"landmark of the modern novel," precursor to Joyce's ''Ulysses'' (23)

"wild proliferation of genres" and discourses within the novel (23)

book <--> narrative <--> sections <--> objects

:"Where Novalis had written down in his notebooks that his task was 'to find a universe in a book,' Goethe's project by contrast relocated this universe across an entire spectrum of printed books and thus '''redefined the literary work as something material, processual, and spatially dispersed'''." (24-5)

affirms novelistic tradition and novel's cosmological claims, but adds "mediological dimension" (25);
conceives of the book not as a "spiritual fortress" (like the Weimar edition) nor "a totality existing for itself: (Schlegel), but "relational, transformable, and dynamic entities";
* book and novel were "refigured, in a word, as networks" (25)

== Copying ==
== Processing ==
== Sharing ==
== Overhearing ==

Piper 2009

2010-05-30T19:42:51Z

98.122.182.39:

Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books: The Making of the Bibliographic Imagination in the Romantic Age.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

== Introduction: Bibliographic Subjects ==

''"Hypothesis: All is Leaf." -- J. W. Goethe''

books <--> literature

: "Learning how to read books and how to want books did not simply occur through the technological, commercial, or legal conditions that made the growing proliferation of books possible. The making of such bibliographic fantasies was also importantly a product of the very narratives and symbolic operations contained ''within'' books as well. It was through romantic literature where individuals came to understand themselves." (4)

"bibliographic surplus" at the turn of the 19th century (5)
* increasing '''diversity''' of books and bibliographic formats circulating
* increasing '''homogeneity''' of geography; books translated across multiple sites (6)

using bibliographic imagination of 19c to understand digital present (7)

:"A study of how nineteenth-century individuals became wedded to or possessed by their books can broaden our perspective of the nature of 'new media' cultures and historical experiences of 'media transition. It can offer parallels, but also differences, to our current process of adapting to communicative change." (7)

emphasizing '''continuities''' between bookish past and digital present; similarities:
* the notion of a network
* the status of the "copy"
* remediating culture data into new forms
* creativity as ''intermedial'' thinking/making (7-8)

these communicative practices "'''came into being'''" during the romantic age (8)

:"The digital provides us wit ha critical lens to see the bibliographic with fresh eyes. But my own work is driven by an alternative desire to show us how the history of books, and romantic books in particular, can help us contextualize our understanding of digital or new media today." (8)

book history helps us recover a sense of "social authorship" (9-10);
but literature can also tell us much about the history of the book (10)
:"Literature makes books as much as books make literature." (11)

:"I am interested in exploring how the symbolic movements ''in'' texts, whether of speech, things, or people, functioned as interpretations of the bibliographic environments through which such texts circulated. ... I want to ask how such circulatory energy was deployed to interrogate new conditions of communicating in books." (11)

in literary studies, romantic age gave us '''opposition between technics and aesthetics''', encouraging us to '''forget the materiality of the book''' -- in fact, focusing on book as object was seen as a mental disorder during the early 19c;
yet book history shows upsurge in production of books during this period (12)
* book was becoming "naturalized" during the 19c (13)
:"The work of romantic writers -- both their books and their fictions -- functioned as a key space where the changes to the material conditions of writing and communication that defined the nineteenth century could be rehearsed, interrogated, and ultimately normalized." (13)

romantic books were negotiating local/global, individual/collective;
work seen as individualistic, from a single genius author, yet book increasingly produced collectively (15)

'''intermediality''' is core to romantic book (16)

== Networking ==

the Weimar edition of Goethe's posthumous papers served as a textual monument mirroring the physical monument of the Goethe and Schille Archive, completed 1896 (19-20)

=== ''Wilhelm Meister's Travels'' ===

"landmark of the modern novel," precursor to Joyce's ''Ulysses'' (23)

"wild proliferation of genres" and discourses within the novel (23)

book <--> narrative <--> sections <--> objects

:"Where Novalis had written down in his notebooks that his task was 'to find a universe in a book,' Goethe's project by contrast relocated this universe across an entire spectrum of printed books and thus '''redefined the literary work as something material, processual, and spatially dispersed'''." (24-5)
== Copying ==
== Processing ==
== Sharing ==
== Overhearing ==

Piper 2009

2010-05-30T19:39:03Z

98.122.182.39: /* Networking */

Piper, Andrew. ''Dreaming in Books: The Making of the Bibliographic Imagination in the Romantic Age.'' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

== Introduction: Bibliographic Subjects ==

''"Hypothesis: All is Leaf." -- J. W. Goethe''

books <--> literature

: "Learning how to read books and how to want books did not simply occur through the technological, commercial, or legal conditions that made the growing proliferation of books possible. The making of such bibliographic fantasies was also importantly a product of the very narratives and symbolic operations contained ''within'' books as well. It was through romantic literature where individuals came to understand themselves." (4)

"bibliographic surplus" at the turn of the 19th century (5)
* increasing '''diversity''' of books and bibliographic formats circulating
* increasing '''homogeneity''' of geography; books translated across multiple sites (6)

using bibliographic imagination of 19c to understand digital present (7)

:"A study of how nineteenth-century individuals became wedded to or possessed by their books can broaden our perspective of the nature of 'new media' cultures and historical experiences of 'media transition. It can offer parallels, but also differences, to our current process of adapting to communicative change." (7)

emphasizing '''continuities''' between bookish past and digital present; similarities:
* the notion of a network
* the status of the "copy"
* remediating culture data into new forms
* creativity as ''intermedial'' thinking/making (7-8)

these communicative practices "'''came into being'''" during the romantic age (8)

:"The digital provides us wit ha critical lens to see the bibliographic with fresh eyes. But my own work is driven by an alternative desire to show us how the history of books, and romantic books in particular, can help us contextualize our understanding of digital or new media today." (8)

book history helps us recover a sense of "social authorship" (9-10);
but literature can also tell us much about the history of the book (10)
:"Literature makes books as much as books make literature." (11)

:"I am interested in exploring how the symbolic movements ''in'' texts, whether of speech, things, or people, functioned as interpretations of the bibliographic environments through which such texts circulated. ... I want to ask how such circulatory energy was deployed to interrogate new conditions of communicating in books." (11)

in literary studies, romantic age gave us '''opposition between technics and aesthetics''', encouraging us to '''forget the materiality of the book''' -- in fact, focusing on book as object was seen as a mental disorder during the early 19c;
yet book history shows upsurge in production of books during this period (12)
* book was becoming "naturalized" during the 19c (13)
:"The work of romantic writers -- both their books and their fictions -- functioned as a key space where the changes to the material conditions of writing and communication that defined the nineteenth century could be rehearsed, interrogated, and ultimately normalized." (13)

romantic books were negotiating local/global, individual/collective;
work seen as individualistic, from a single genius author, yet book increasingly produced collectively (15)

'''intermediality''' is core to romantic book (16)

== Networking ==

the Weimar edition of Goethe's posthumous papers served as a textual monument mirroring the physical monument of the Goethe and Schille Archive, completed 1896 (19-20)

=== ''Wilhelm Meister's Travels'' ===

book <--> narrative <--> sections <--> objects

== Copying ==
== Processing ==
== Sharing ==
== Overhearing ==

Main Page

2010-05-30T19:36:05Z

98.122.182.39:

== Notes ==
=== Books ===
==== [[Deleuze 1990|Deleuze, Gilles. '''Logic of Sense.''']] ====
==== [[Piper 2009|Piper, Andrew. '''Dreaming in Books.''' Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.]] ====
=== Classes ===

Piper 2009

2010-05-30T19:12:36Z